PORTLAND: A federal judge in Oregon temporarily blocked President Donald Trump&rsquo;s administration from deploying the National Guard in Portland, ruling Saturday in a lawsuit brought by the state and city.&nbsp;US District Judge Karin Immergut, who was appointed by Trump during his first term, issued the order pending further arguments in the suit. She said the relatively small protests the city has seen did not justify the use of federalized forces and allowing the deployment could harm Oregon&#39;s state sovereignty.&nbsp;&ldquo;This country has a longstanding and foundational tradition of resistance to government overreach, especially in the form of military intrusion into civil affairs,&quot; Immergut wrote.She later continued, &ldquo;This historical tradition boils down to a simple proposition: this is a nation of Constitutional law, not martial law.&rdquo;&nbsp;The Trump administration late Saturday filed a notice of appeal to the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals.&nbsp;State and city officials sued to stop the deployment last week, one day after the Trump administration announced that 200 Oregon National Guard troops would be federalized to protect federal buildings. The president called the city &ldquo;war-ravaged.&rdquo;&nbsp;Oregon officials said that characterization was ludicrous. The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement building in the city has been the site of nightly protests that typically drew a couple dozen people in recent weeks before the deployment was announced. Trump federalizes troops in OregonSeparately, California Governor Gavin Newsom said he would go to court to fight the move by President Donald Trump to send National Guard members from his state to Oregon, where protesters have gathered near a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement building in Portland. Oregon Governor Tina Kotek said 101 California National Guard members arrived in her state on Saturday night by plane and more were on the way.&nbsp; Kotek said there has been no formal communication with the federal government about the deployment.&nbsp; &ldquo;There is no need for military intervention in Oregon,&quot; Kotek said Sunday.&nbsp;Judge: The federal response didn&#39;t match the factsGenerally speaking the president is allowed &ldquo;a great level of deference&rdquo; to federalize National Guard troops in situations where regular law enforcement forces are not able to execute the laws of the United States, the judge said, but that has not been the case in Portland.&nbsp;Plaintiffs were able to show that the demonstrations at the immigration building were not significantly violent or disruptive ahead of the president&#39;s order, the judge wrote, and &ldquo;overall, the protests were small and uneventful.&rdquo;&nbsp;&ldquo;The President&rsquo;s determination was simply untethered to the facts,&rdquo; Immergut wrote.&nbsp;White House says it will appealFollowing the ruling, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said that &ldquo;President Trump exercised his lawful authority to protect federal assets and personnel in Portland following violent riots and attacks on law enforcement, we expect to be vindicated by a higher court.&rdquo;&nbsp;Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield called the ruling &ldquo;a healthy check on the president.&rdquo;&nbsp;&ldquo;It reaffirms what we already knew: Portland is not the president&rsquo;s war-torn fantasy. Our city is not ravaged, and there is no rebellion,&rdquo; Rayfield said in a statement. He added: &ldquo;Members of the Oregon National Guard are not a tool for him to use in his political theater.&rdquo; Trump has deployed or threatened to deploy troops in several US cities, particularly ones led by Democrats, including Los Angeles, Washington, Chicago and Memphis. Speaking Tuesday to US military leaders in Virginia, he proposed using cities as training grounds for the armed forces. Last month a federal judge ruled that the president&#39;s deployment of some 4,700 National Guard soldiers and Marines in Los Angeles this year was illegal, but he allowed the 300 who remain in the city to stay as long as they do not enforce civilian laws. The Trump administration appealed, and an appellate panel has put the lower court&#39;s block on hold while it moves forward.&nbsp;Portland protests were small, but grew after deployment was announcedThe Portland protests have been limited to a one-block area in a city that covers about 145 square miles and has about 636,000 residents.&nbsp;They grew somewhat following the September 28 announcement of the guard deployment. The Portland Police Bureau, which has said it does not participate in immigration enforcement and only intervenes in the protests if there is vandalism or criminal activity, arrested two people on assault charges. A peaceful march earlier that day drew thousands to downtown and saw no arrests, police said.&nbsp;On Saturday, before the ruling was released, roughly 400 people marched to the ICE facility. The crowd included people of all ages and races, families with children and older people using walkers, The Oregonian/OregonLive reported.&nbsp;Federal agents responded with chemical crowd control munitions, including tear gas canisters and less-lethal guns that sprayed pepper balls. At least six people were arrested as the protesters reached the ICE facility.&nbsp;Later in the evening, federal agents again emerged from the facility and deployed tear gas on a crowd of about 100 people.

Americas

Trump federalizes troops in Oregon; Judge says federal response didn't match the facts; White House says it will appeal.







Articles tagged with "PORTLAND"

Judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from deploying troops in Portland